Forgot password?
A law blog by Robert Lombardo on The Whole 9

Attorney Robert Lombardo came from the creative world and then began practicing law in 1995. The diversity of his professional life (years of which were spent in Europe, Australia and Japan) gives him a unique perspective on the law. Currently Robert is focusing on entertainment law (which encompasses nearly all creative industries) and brings this firsthand experience and desire to make the law accessible to the The Whole 9 community.

Legal Self-Help: Kind of, sort of, like self-medication.

OK, I know it is dreadfully boring, and butt ugly, but you really should know some of the rules upon which you operate your business.

You wouldn’t go to Las Vegas – sit at the Blackjack table and bet a grand on your hand – if you didn’t know the rules? Would you? (“I thought that was an ‘eleven.’ Yes, it is an ‘eleven’; but it is also a ‘one.’ Damn!”)

Even if you can afford a lawyer to come to your rescue when you screw up, you will certainly save time and money by educating yourself in the law – well, as much as possible.

The business of “Art” is not really much different from all the other businesses. (Oh yeah, how did that sound? Just another business?) If there is an opportunity to make some money, and you have talent, then you can be sure that some dirt bag is looking to screw you. In the “Art” industry, getting ahead often means taking advantage of “artists,” who usually aren’t experienced in the law. However, if you understand the basics of the law, there is less of a chance that the dirt bag will screw you. Now if you like getting screwed by dirt bags then read no further; when your time comes, you can, as they say, “lay back and enjoy it.”

It would do me good, to do you good. In other words: know the basics of the law; to minimizing the screwing. (Again, those of you who enjoy the screwing can pour yourself another drink or fire up another bowl and go watch “America’s Got Talent” – or the ilk.)

Okay, if you are still with me, the first and most important step in running your “Art” business is to accept the fact that it is a business.

Producing “Art” is your creative work and selling that “Art” is a business. Are you interested in selling your “Art”? Then legal knowledge is essential to your success.

Hopefully, you will come to find that taking care of your business actually involves creativity and may not be quite as boring as you once thought (well, maybe not). You might even get turned on to the fact that there is power that comes with understanding the law. (OK, maybe that is really a stretch but give me a little leeway with the hyperbole here – it sounds sexy.)

You do not need to do all the legal work yourself but it is important, especially at the beginning, that you understand basic legal principles in order to make the “right” decisions and avoid the chasms of failure (and, thus, the proverbial screwing).

At the very least, I hope I can dispel any apathy (i.e. “I don’t know and I don’t care”).

And don’t even think of sending me an e-mail to tell me that you “just cannot understand legal principles.” If you have the cognitive skills to create “Art,” believe me, you have the skills to understand the law.

I will attempt to dispense with the legal jargon or “legalese” and talk in a language you understand but I will need you to hold my feet to the fire on this one. (I just love the lingo!)

Are we on the same page? Everything is copacetic? OK, your first assignment is to check out the Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts Website and really take a good look around – it is a great resource. I will follow its syllabus: copyrights; trademarks; contracts; and entity formation. Please leave me a comment with any question you may have on these subjects, poste haste, in order that I may address them in the appropriate post.

Finally, I leave you with this from B. Russell: “A chicken may have been fed by a certain man throughout its life, and have come to look to him confidently for food; but one day he wrings its neck instead. It would have been better for the chicken if its inductive inferences had been less crude.”

Don’t be a chicken. Please.

  1. Yup – Couldn’t have said it better myself – but I don’t connect with the title – ? – I beg to differ that legal self-help is impossible – it’s akin to self-defense tactics. I myself have fought my way out of the preliminary stages of legal entanglements of a minor sort on my own with the help of the (self-help legal) Nolo Press! I recommend them. Knowledge is power, esp. in the legal arena.

  2. Ah, I like this blog already. I can’t wait to read more about the ins and outs of creative legalities.

    Here’s a broad-but-all-important question that I’ve recently looked into but come across many divergent answers for: how would you interpret Fair Use as it applies to an artist, illustrator or designer creating something for a client on a work-for-hire basis who then wants to use said work in a portfolio for self-promotional purposes?

    I’ve seen arguments that say something along the lines of ‘whomsoever owns the copyright shall set all the standards forthwith’ and others that (perhaps quixotically) declare that Fair Use allows for the creator of the work to use the work for self-promotion, regardless of who owns the copyright (and if they give permission or not).

    I know this is a hot and touchy issue, especially with all the tinder the Internet has added to the fire, but I’m all ears as to how it all works out.

    Thanks!

  3. I didn’t mean to infer that it was impossible, pamphyila, with the reference to self –medicating in the title. What I meant to convey was that we all seem to be able to take care of our own minor ailments with over-the-counter drugs (and sometimes with a prescription written for someone else) without too much difficulty. My argument is that we should be doing the same with “everyday” legal issues.
    However, it would be foolish to act as your own doctor if you broke your leg. (Booze, combined with your friend’s leftover OxyContin is not a sound (long term) treatment plan; in my humble opinion. Of course, you should consult with your physician and check if that plan is right for you.)
    Likewise, if you are pulled over on the freeway by a State Trooper and in your trunk of your car he finds several bricks of Peruvian flake you might want to seriously consider hiring a lawyer.

  4. Colin (that is your name; is it not?):

    The concept of “fair use” has to the most misconstrued.

    It is not an exemption. It is a defense; and a fairly narrow one.

    That means an infringement must have occurred first and then you can use the defense.

    Suffice it to say that if you “use said work in a portfolio for self-promotional purposes,” you will be infringing upon a copyright; unless you had an agreement to the contrary with the owner of the “work-for-hire.”

    I will address these issues more fully in my next post.

    Robert

  5. BUK BUK BUKAAAAWWWWW !

    I concurr and recommend Lawyers for the Arts perusal. That said, an ounce of prevention will help you sleep nights. II have has sleepless nights through a few harrowing experiences relating to service mark. All on the defensive, having CAREFULLY, PRESCIENTLY minded my p’s and q’s. Astonishing really. Robert, are you any kind of specialist in service marks, or perhaps a fan of a collegue you may like to recommend. = : ) ~

  6. Servicemarks, Trademarks; ain’t nothing you should be losing sleep over dude.

    Tell us what kept you up at night and I’ll see if I can make you sleep like a baby, Baby!

    Keep the hits coming.!

  7. Biko,
    Thank you for being here. I am so glad you are willing to give your advice to such a worthwhile group at TheWhole9. I have said over and over that artists need contracts because contracts are fences and fences make good neighbors.

    I look forward to even more advise from someone in the know. It means alot.

  8. The business of art, yes, many artists don’t consider this aspect when creating. I thank you for poviding your legal expertise to the rest of us.
    My question is about contracts. Is there a standard you can point me to? for murals- or other freelance work…
    also- how is freelance different from independent contractor?
    Claudia

  9. Thanks John.

    I had not heard the contracts/fences analogy before and have to admit it is a great one. I will have to steal that someday.

  10. Claudia:

    A freelancer is, or should be, legally, an independent contractor. Consultants or freelancers or independent contractors: they are all “free agents” – free to negotiate their own contracts.

    As far as a “standard” goes; I will assume you mean a standard Independent contractor agreement. Here is one:

    http://smallbusiness.findlaw.com/business-forms-contracts/business-forms-contracts-a-to-z/form1-36.html

    There are many places you can get standard contracts. However, you need to read them and tweak them as necessary.

    Good Luck.

    Robert

  11. A friend and i started an S-corporation to open an art gallery but were unsusceccfull.We applied for business credit card and loans and spent money in the start-up. Now the bank put these debts in my personal credit report as collection and my credit score went down more than 200 points. I do not know if that is legal and what can I do to fix my credit. Ed

  12. Thank you so much!
    the link helped me a lot, and gave me a good starting point for further reaserach.
    I’m sure I’ll gave more questions later.
    thanks again-
    Claudia

  13. Mmmmmmmm, my curiosity is piqued… I enjoy your writing style, first off (all of the inferences to “screwing” are just what a soldier stuck in Baghdad needs to hear), and I appreciate the attempt to educate young artists so that they can effectively avoid getting… screwed…

  14. Ed:

    You don’t give me much information so I will have to make some assumptions – which I hate – and work backwards.

    You tell me when an assumption is wrong.

    For the bank to affect your personal credit, it must have had your social security number.

    And for the bank to have had your social security number, you must have given it to them.

    And the reason the bank wanted your social security number was because your S-Corp had no credit history.

    And so, in effect, you personally guaranteed the loans and credit.

    If these assumptions are correct, you have some problems.

    What you can do about it is another story.

    Let me know.

    Robert

  15. Ciao Claudia!

  16. B. Murphy:

    Thank you and stay tuned! You are lucky to have the Internet. Can you imagine what it must have been like to serve overseas even 10 years ago? Hotter and drier no doubt.

    Keep the faith!

    Robert

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Click here to login or join.