Forgot password?
A creative blog by Jim Kalin on The Whole 9

Novelist Jim Kalin lives in Los Angeles, writes a monthly column for Amateur Wrestling News, and has traded in his speargun for a banjo. His wife and son sing harmony.

FLY WEIGHT

The airlines are in trouble, and I think I can help.

Recently, the airline industry changed its luggage policy and downsized how much each passenger can check in and carry on board before being charged extra. Essentially, it all boils down to a matter of weight. There is even talk of reducing the amount of fuel by loading just enough to get to a destination plus an additional top-off for an extra 45 minutes. Fuel for a flight runs into thousands and thousands of dollars, so this would absolutely make a difference.

But how about implementing a new method for pricing passenger fares?
Does it make sense that a ticket for a ten-year old who weighs seventy pounds is the same price as that for an adult male who tips the scales at two-hundred and eighty pounds? A plane filled with Cub Scouts would burn much less fuel than one loaded with Cleveland Browns, so selling tickets based on just the occupied seat and not weight seems cockeyed. A person’s size doesn’t affect a company’s profit in a movie theatre or a museum, but airplanes are a completely different matter, and it’s illogical to treat it otherwise.

So much in our lives is based on weight and measurement, so why not airline tickets? Most groceries are priced by measuring items out by weight, volume, or amount; one dozen eggs, eight fluid ounces, two pounds.

And travel attire would change. Passengers would opt to go for lightweight clothes, and might even wear only bikinis and bathing trunks as long as the airliners’ cabins were kept warm. Many travelers would treat the departure date as a wrestling or boxing weigh-in. They’d train the week prior to their flight, and probably cut back on food and water intake the last forty-eight hours. We might even see passengers running laps at the airport to make a travel weight-class.

Wouldn’t this lead to a healthier America, or at least for those who can still afford to fly? And with costs rising for everything, especially groceries, eating less would fit nicely into this new economy.

Do I sound preposterous? Maybe I am going a bit too far, but I need to write a few light blogs, you know, get the laughter flowing, or at least coax a smile out of readers. I can’t always be serious. I mean, what do you expect me to say? That we need to begin charging for gas according to the size vehicle someone drives? (Aww…did I say that?)

Let me know your ideas about how we can cope with this rapidly changing economy.

  1. I couldn’t agree with you more about charging passengers by the pound but I’d like to (excuse the pun) expand a bit on your concept. Luggage weight limits have always applied. Let’s assume the *average* weight of a female is (oh, this is so scary, considering Los Angeles is the foreskin of anorexia) is what, 150 lbs. and a male is 200 lbs. Let’s also assume that the airline allows a (domestic) bag to weigh no more than 50 lbs. Here is where it could get interesting. Based on this formula, all females would have a TOTAL weight allotment of 200 lbs and males 250 lbs to bring their fat asses and/or worldly goods on the plane. Anything over that limit would incur an additional poundage fee (rounded up, of course, never down). I kind of like it! For the first time in decades, I could actually travel with 72 lbs of luggage (without having to pay extra!).
    I know there are people that will argue that this is discriminating, and, in essence, they are correct. But isn’t the First Class section of an airplane equally as discriminating for similar reasons? You pay more to avoid someone’s unwashed flesh from flowing over your armrest or, to at least get free, bad food, instead of none at all (not to mention the cocktails). Why haven’t airlines capitalized on or marketed the idea of designing airplanes for different sizes of people?
    Remember, there was a time, not long ago when there was only one size of hamburger at McDonald’s.
    Care to biggie size that?
    ;)

  2. Wow, whatta topic! Just got back from a trip to Texas, the perfect example. There was a big boy (height and girth) standing in line who smelled of onions and fast-food, I knew he’d be sitting next to me. Cowboy hat, boots and big belt. The belt buckle alone must’ve weighed in at 50 lbs. As it turned out he sat up a row and across. I’m sure he was a great guy and no doubt deserved to get to his destination as much as anyone else, but he was the poster child for the notion of a weight cap for luggage and person. I wonder what the airlines would say if this were truly a consideration, a topic. It would be discriminatory of course, as much as the old rules that applied to flight attendants, but think of the stink it would raise. Could you imagine a weight scale at the gate, or ticketing counter? All these people standing on the scale WITH their luggage and being made to pay the extra surcharge because the fibbed a bit when they bought the ticket, or maybe had a Bob’s Big Boy breakfast before heading to the airport.

    As it stands now one bag seemed fine. The overheads were a little tight with people bringing that much more on, but all in all we made it. It’ll be hell around Xmas time when people pack their gifts as well. Hey, maybe it’ll help the much troubled postal service and they can stop their whining. Ces’t la vie.

    P.S. I ended up sitting next to this lovely Asian woman who was learning English with a small handbook. I was humbled by her patience and intensity.

  3. okay, let’s start with ‘Los Angeles is the foreskin on anorexia’…actually, I have no place to go with that, but I like it. A lot.
    All too true (and thanks for saying it); my second home is on a plane and it has become such a miserable existence.
    I dread those long flights spent with unwelcome, unsolicited flesh pressing against mine. Spilling over into my space.
    The seats are too small. The passengers are too big and the only solve some of the airlines are making involves recouping fuel costs instead of reducing fuel use.

  4. Here here!

    First step: turn those conveyor belts at airports on backwards. Now you’ve got airport-based treadmills!

    What else?

  5. I have to second the airport-based treadmills idea. And something to the effect of beginning with an average weight for both males and females is a great idea, maybe we can actually bring the average female weight down to 150 in the US (outside of LA)!
    My question here is: would student discounts then ride on the fact that we are presumably too poor to eat and can’t afford anything heavy worth traveling with? Hmmm…perhaps this is the answer to the Freshman 15. No coming home for the holidays if you let that meal plan get the best of you!

16 Trackbacks

  1. By property and casualty license exam on June 5, 2011 at 10:43 am

    The best website……

    [...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]……

  2. By Fathers Day Gifts on June 7, 2011 at 7:51 am

    Superb website…

    [...]always a big fan of linking to bloggers that I love but don’t get a lot of link love from[...]……

  3. By Mauritius Self Catering Accommodation on June 7, 2011 at 8:26 am

    Great website…

    [...]we like to honor many other internet sites on the web, even if they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Under are some webpages worth checking out[...]……

  4. By ColonBlow on June 7, 2011 at 9:14 am

    Websites worth visiting…

    [...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]……

  5. By What Is Adoption on June 7, 2011 at 12:36 pm

    WOW! check this out!…

    Amazing Post, worth a read…

  6. By Targeted website traffic on June 7, 2011 at 12:58 pm

    Websites you should visit…

    [...]below you’ll find the link to some sites that we think you should visit[...]……

  7. By Buy Kratom on June 7, 2011 at 2:50 pm

    Sources…

    [...]check below, are some totally unrelated websites to ours, however, they are most trustworthy sources that we use[...]……

  8. By Can I Join Planet Love Match? on June 7, 2011 at 4:05 pm

    Links…

    [...]Sites of interest we have a link to[...]…

  9. By Yacon Syrup on June 7, 2011 at 6:50 pm

    Visitor recommendations…

    [...]one of our visitors recently recommended the following website[...]……

  10. By leopard boots on June 7, 2011 at 8:37 pm

    Visitor recommendations…

    [...]one of our visitors recently recommended the following website[...]……

  11. By Appartements Ile Maurice on June 7, 2011 at 11:42 pm

    Great website…

    [...]we like to honor many other internet sites on the web, even if they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Under are some webpages worth checking out[...]……

  12. By Quiet Treadmills on June 8, 2011 at 1:45 am

    As You Like It…

    blog here! Also your website quite a bit up fast! What host are you the usage of? Can I get your associate link to your host? I wish my site loaded up as fast as yours lol…

  13. Sites we Like…

    [...] Every once in a while we choose blogs that we read. Listed below are the latest sites that we choose [...]…

  14. By Best Drip Coffee on June 8, 2011 at 7:01 am

    As You Like It…

    blog here! Also your website so much up fast! What web host are you the usage of? Can I am getting your associate link to your host? I desire my web site loaded up as fast as yours lol…

  15. By Location Ile Maurice on June 8, 2011 at 7:17 am

    Website trackback Link…

    [...]although websites we backlink to below are considerably not related to ours, we feel they are actually worth a go through, so have a look[...]……

  16. By Wine Coolers on June 8, 2011 at 8:57 am

    As You Like It…

    weblog right here! Also your website so much up fast! What host are you the usage of? Can I get your affiliate hyperlink to your host? I desire my site loaded up as quickly as yours lol…

Leave a Comment

You must be a member and be logged in to leave a comment. Click here to log in or join.